Wednesday , May 23 2018
Home » Blogs » MACRO VIEW COLUMNS: The Bond Market Is Probably Underpricing Fed Risks: Macro Man
Охранник на фоне изображения здания ФРС США и логотипа регулятора в Вашингтоне 16 марта 2016 года. Представители Федрезерва США посчитали, что американская экономика может быть готова к новому повышению процентных ставок в июне, следует из протокола апрельского заседания центробанка, опубликованного в среду. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo

MACRO VIEW COLUMNS: The Bond Market Is Probably Underpricing Fed Risks: Macro Man

(Bloomberg) — Tuesday’s edition of this column suggested that asset markets might need to price in an element of “Team America” style geopolitical risk. The reference, of course, was to risky assets like equities and credit where volatility is low and there seems to be lots of good news in the price. Fixed income markets, on the other hand, arguably skew too far the other way — pricing a litany of bad news that will prevent monetary authorities from tightening or otherwise normalizing policy. For bond traders, problems could arise if markets take a look at the U.S. and say “America! Heck yeah!” .

  • Let’s be clear: the U.S. has offered plenty of disappointments thus far in 2017. From the failure of Trump’s business-friendly fiscal agenda to weak inflation to a string of poor early-year growth figures, there are reasons why the dollar has sold off and bonds have rallied
  • At some point, however, bad news gets more than fully priced into rate markets — and it looks like we’re there. One month dollar OIS swaps one year forward are now just 17 bps above the level of effective Fed funds. That’s the lowest since the mid-2016 growth scare, which broadly coincided with lows in the dollar and Treasury yields
  • While Wednesday’s Q2 GDP revisions are obviously backward-looking, they do paint the picture of a fairly healthy economy. Consumer spending grew above 3% Q/Q and business investment growth was strong. Moreover, both the Atlanta and St. Louis Fed’s nowcasts project Q3 growth above 3% as well. That’s hardly the stuff of ending a rate cycle, now is it?
  • To be sure, the risks sketched out in the earlier column remain, and they are one of the reasons that it makes sense for the market to price less tightening than the Fed projects in their infamous dot plots. That’s particularly the case given the uncertainty over who will lead the Fed in 2018 and beyond. Still, the gulf between “pricing less than the dot plot” and “pricing almost no tightening” is still pretty wide
  • We also shouldn’t forget that expectations tend to mean-revert. Since the start of 2015, there is a decent negative correlation between the amount of Fed tightening priced over the next year and the subsequent three-month change in Treasury yields. If past relationships hold, the current level of Fed pricing suggests that 10y yields should rise 20 bps over the next few months
  • Successful trading and investing is all about identifying asymmetries and exploiting them by deploying capital and managing risk. For now, those risks are skewed toward more rather than less Fed tightening being priced
  • NOTE: Cameron Crise is a macro strategist who writes for Bloomberg. The observations made are his own and are not intended as investment advice.

To contact the reporter on this story: Cameron Crise in New York at

About Makkaba Co., Ltd.

Makkaba Co., Ltd.

Hotline: (+84)(0) 904935786; Tel.: (+84) (0)28.35208726
Email: - Phone:

Check Also

Hong kong’s headline inflation slows in April, inflationary pressures likely to go up in 2018

Hong kong’s headline inflation slows in April, inflationary pressures likely to go up in 2018 …

S&P 500 earnings update

S&P 500 earnings update 93 percent of the companies in S&P 500 have reported their …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *